Thread: GeoJSON proposal

Started: 2022-07-27 13:07:29

Last activity: 2022-07-27 16:33:19

Topics: FDSN Working Group V

This thread is from a mailing list that has moved to Google Groups. Use the following links to browse the updated archives.

FDSN Working Group V

Wayne Crawford

GeoJSON proposal

2022-07-27 13:07:29

Dear FDSN Working Group 5 members

Our proposal phase review team has approved Tim Ahern's concept for a GeoCSV format for rapidly changing parameters not handled well in SEED. I have attached their review.

Before going onto the Evaluation and Adoption phase, which will be led by WG 2, we need a vote to proceed with the current plan.

If you represent a network or a datacentre, could you please vote yes or no on proceeding with the current plan.

Regards
Wayne Crawford
Chair, FDSN Working Group 5

_______________________________
Wayne Crawford
CNRS Researcher
Bureau 341
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
1, rue Jussieu
75238 Paris Cedex 05
+33 6 5151 1054

View this message in Google Groups at https://groups.google.com/a/fdsn.org/d/msgid/fdsn-wg5-portable/165895140008.20648.10315384237344544527%40fdsn1.fdsn.org.

Jerry Carter

Re: GeoJSON proposal

2022-07-27 15:27:13

IRIS votes YES.

Jerry

(206) 547-0393 x122

On Jul 27, 2022, at 12:50, Wayne Crawford (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg5-portable-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:

Dear FDSN Working Group 5 members

Our proposal phase review team has approved Tim Ahern's concept for a GeoCSV format for rapidly changing parameters not handled well in SEED http://www.fdsn.org/media/wg/V/2021/WGV_GeoCSV_Framework_Proposal.pdf. I have attached their review.

Before going onto the Evaluation and Adoption phase, which will be led by WG 2, we need a vote to proceed with the current plan.

If you represent a network or a datacentre, could you please vote yes or no on proceeding with the current plan.

Regards
Wayne Crawford
Chair, FDSN Working Group 5

_______________________________
Wayne Crawford
CNRS Researcher
Bureau 341
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
1, rue Jussieu
75238 Paris Cedex 05
+33 6 5151 1054
<review_jowa.pdf>
----------------------
FDSN Working Group V
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg5-portable/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg5-portable-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org <fdsn-wg5-portable-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org>

Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/

View this message in Google Groups at https://groups.google.com/a/fdsn.org/d/msgid/fdsn-wg5-portable/165896088007.20648.10646117488903260634%40fdsn1.fdsn.org.
TIm Ahern

Re: GeoJSON proposal

2022-07-27 16:33:19

EarthScope Oceans votes yes

On Jul 27, 2022, at 12:50 PM, Wayne Crawford (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg5-portable-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:

Dear FDSN Working Group 5 members

Our proposal phase review team has approved Tim Ahern's concept for a GeoCSV format for rapidly changing parameters not handled well in SEED http://www.fdsn.org/media/wg/V/2021/WGV_GeoCSV_Framework_Proposal.pdf. I have attached their review.

Before going onto the Evaluation and Adoption phase, which will be led by WG 2, we need a vote to proceed with the current plan.

If you represent a network or a datacentre, could you please vote yes or no on proceeding with the current plan.

Regards
Wayne Crawford
Chair, FDSN Working Group 5

_______________________________
Wayne Crawford
CNRS Researcher
Bureau 341
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
1, rue Jussieu
75238 Paris Cedex 05
+33 6 5151 1054
<review_jowa.pdf>
----------------------
FDSN Working Group V
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg5-portable/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg5-portable-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org

Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/

View this message in Google Groups at https://groups.google.com/a/fdsn.org/d/msgid/fdsn-wg5-portable/165896484002.20648.12999664103887859159%40fdsn1.fdsn.org.

Thread: GeoJSON proposal

Attachments