"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
South Carolina Seismic Network votes Yes.--
Philip Crotwell
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:29 PM Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <
fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:
Dear WG2 members,----------------------
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Dear WG2 members,--
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
On Apr 12, 2023, at 9:28 AM, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
--On Apr 12, 2023, at 9:28 AM, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:----------------------
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
VARNING: Klicka inte på länkar och öppna inte bilagor om du inte känner igen avsändaren och vet att innehållet är säkert.
CAUTION: Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
perspective."
On Apr 18, 2023, at 13:42, Ackerley, Nicholas (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org> wrote:
CHIS/NRCan (operator of Canadian National Seismograph Network) votes Yes.
Nick Ackerley
(he, him, il, lui)
Seismic Analyst, Canadian Hazard Information Service
Natural Resources Canada / Government of Canada
Analyste Sismique, Service canadien d'information sur les risques
Ressources naturelles Canada / Gouvernement du Canada
nicholas.ackerley<at>nrcan-rncan.gc.ca <nicholas.ackerley<at>nrcan-rncan.gc.ca> / 343-551-3972
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.earthquakescanada.ca/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3cKabeBJ$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.earthquakescanada.ca/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3cKabeBJ$>
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org <fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org> <fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org <fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org>>
Sent: April 12, 2023 12:28
To: FDSN Working Group II <fdsn-wg2-data<at>lists.fdsn.org <fdsn-wg2-data<at>lists.fdsn.org>>
Subject: [fdsn-wg2-data] Voting phase (14th-21th April) Final Report on the miniSEED3 Proposal
***Caution - email originated from outside of NRCan. Read the warning below / Attention- Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur des RNCan. Voir la mise en garde ci-dessous***
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
perspective."
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3ZhC6MNz$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3ZhC6MNz$> | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org <fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org>
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3YNb_6lk$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3YNb_6lk$> )
Update subscription preferences at https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3QfhwfBu$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3QfhwfBu$>
This email originated from outside of NRCan. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and believe the content is safe. For more information, please visit How to Identify Phishinghttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://intranet.nrcan.gc.ca/services-policies/dont-get-scammed-cyber-security-101__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3YyYZIln$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://intranet.nrcan.gc.ca/services-policies/dont-get-scammed-cyber-security-101__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3YyYZIln$> > emails on the NRCan Intranet.
Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur des RNCan. Ne cliquez pas sur les liens et n'ouvrez pas les pièces jointes, à moins de connaître l'expéditeur et croire que le contenu est sécuritaire. Pour de plus amples renseignements, veuillez consulter Comment identifier des courriels d'hameçonnageshttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://intranet.nrcan.gc.ca/services-policies/dont-get-scammed-cyber-security-101__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3YyYZIln$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://intranet.nrcan.gc.ca/services-policies/dont-get-scammed-cyber-security-101__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3YyYZIln$> > dans l'intranet des RNCan.
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3ZhC6MNz$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3ZhC6MNz$> | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org <fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org>
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3YNb_6lk$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3YNb_6lk$> )
Update subscription preferences at https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3QfhwfBu$ https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/__;!!Mih3wA!BkKXtd3yTN94371cgtZkqq0vcyfmZacn2QS95gdMNVEo6lPsRv_CtW4C4lLbfRlUiexEkwiAQ4I-GaLsqPxhZodv3QfhwfBu$>
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
perspective."
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
perspective."
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
JAMSTEC votes yes--
Regards,
Seiji Tsuboi
2023年4月13日(木) 1:28 Javier Quinteros (via FDSN)
<fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org>:
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to
discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and
move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can
within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their
time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home:
http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center
(http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at
http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home:http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe:fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences athttp://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Il giorno 12 apr 2023, alle ore 18:28, Javier Quinteros (via FDSN) <fdsn-wg2-data-bounce<at>lists.fdsn.org> ha scritto:
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
Dear WG2 members,
As I mentioned some weeks ago, we are closing the time window to discuss
the outcome of the final report regarding the *miniSEED3* Proposal.
The final recommendation was clear
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."
using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the
recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about
its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
In summary,
*When* Voting from *14th April to 21th April*
*What* Vote *Yes/No* for the Acceptance of the Recommendation and move
into the adoption phase.
I would like to ask representatives to vote as soon as they can within
this period.
Thanks a lot to the members of the Team, who have invested their time to
conclude this task. In alphabetical order:
Jarek Bienkowski, Robert Casey, Philip Crotwell, David Easton, Philip
Hill, and Roman Racine. And of course, also to Chad, who was the one
presenting the proposal and was leading this initiative.
Best,
--
Javier Quinteros
-------------------------------------------
2.4/Seismologie
Tel.: +49 (0)331/288-1931
Fax: +49 (0)331/288-1277
Email: javier<at>gfz-potsdam.de
___________________________________
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
----------------------
FDSN Working Group II
Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg2-data/ |
Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg2-data-unsubscribe<at>lists.fdsn.org
Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been using in the last years, we need to decide if we accept the recommendation from the Review Team and move on with a decision about its adoption and coexistence with our other community standards.
perspective."
"The team recommends approval of the proposal from a technicalAs established in the Framework for adoption of features we've been
perspective."