I would vote in favor of this small change. Jim Lyons responded in
favor yesterday as well.
Tim
Program Manager, IRIS Data Management System
IRIS DMC
1408 NE 45th Street #201
Seattle, WA 98105
(206)547-0393 x118
(206) 547-1093 FAX
On Nov 1, 2007, at 8:16 AM, Dost, Bernard ((KNMI)) wrote:
Dear Tim and other members of the WG2
I do not see any problem. In order to allow everyone to react, I
propose to have a two week period to collect reactions.
Any objections?
Cheers
Bernard
From: fdsn-wg2-data-bounces<at>iris.washington.edu [mailto:fdsn-wg2-
data-bounces<at>iris.washington.edu] On Behalf Of Tim Ahern
Sent: 30 October 2007 21:56
To: FDSN WGII
Subject: [fdsn-wg2-data] Proposed Channel Naming Convention addition
Dear WG II
I was contacted by a data supplier in Alaska that monitors
lightening strikes by measuring changes in electrical potential in
the air as measured
by an antenna. He would like to name it EQO
The E is standard
the Q is for Electrical Potential
They would like to add a code of O for omnidirectional for the
orientation as this sensor has no preferred direction.
Do I have your approval to add the O designation after the Q
Electrical Potential Instrumentation? I think this has no adverse
effects. I will wait to hear back from Bernard before making the
change.
Cheers
Tim
Program Manager, IRIS Data Management System
IRIS DMC
1408 NE 45th Street #201
Seattle, WA 98105
(206)547-0393 x118
(206) 547-1093 FAX